CONTEXT JAMMING

Field notes from inside the context window.

FounderFiles·N°003·Philosophy · Effective Altruism · AI Governance

1987 —

Will MacAskill — moral philosopher and co-founder of the Centre for Effective Altruism
Fig. · Subject portraitCentre for Effective Altruism

Subject·William MacAskill·Moral philosopher · Co-founder, Centre for Effective Altruism

Will MacAskill.

He built the institutional infrastructure that turned a small philosophical argument into one of the most influential movements in AI governance and longtermist thought.

MacAskill didn’t just argue that future people matter. He built the organizations, the career pipeline, and the cultural grammar that made that argument operationally powerful inside AI labs and governments.

BORN
Glasgow, Scotland · 1987
AT
University of Oxford · CEA
FILE
N°003
§ 01 · The Argument

Future people are not optional

MacAskill’s core contribution was never just the philosophical claim that future generations matter. Plenty of philosophers had said versions of that before. His move was to treat it as an **operational** problem: if future people have moral weight, then the highest-leverage thing a talented person can do is steer the trajectory of civilization at its most important moments.

This framing turned effective altruism from a donation philosophy into a **career and institution-building project**. It created a pipeline that funneled high-agency people into AI safety, biosecurity, and governance roles. Whether that pipeline was net positive is still being debated. What is not debatable is that MacAskill built one of the most effective talent funnels in the history of the AI alignment movement.

The most important century is the one in which we develop advanced AI. We are living in it.
MacAskill, paraphrased
§ 02 · The Infrastructure

Building the movement, not just the idea

In 2011, MacAskill co-founded the Centre for Effective Altruism with Toby Ord. Over the next decade, CEA became the central nervous system of the effective altruism movement: it ran 80,000 Hours, Giving What We Can, the EA Forum, and multiple global conferences. It professionalized what had been a loose network of philosophers and rationalists.

This institutional layer mattered enormously for AI. It created a shared language, a set of prestige signals, and a career track that made working on AI safety legible and high-status inside certain circles. Many of the people who later joined OpenAI, Anthropic, and various AI governance organizations passed through CEA or its adjacent institutions.

§ 03 · Longtermism and AI

The bet on the most important century

MacAskill’s 2022 book *What We Owe the Future* crystallized “strong longtermism” — the view that the primary moral priority of our time is to positively influence the long-run future. The book explicitly frames advanced AI as one of the most important developments in human history, and therefore one of the highest-stakes areas for careful action.

This framing had real effects inside AI labs. It gave intellectual cover and moral urgency to people working on alignment and governance. It also created tension: once you accept that the long-term future may be decided in the next few decades by AI, the pressure to move fast (or to slow down) becomes extremely high. MacAskill’s own position has been relatively cautious compared to accelerationist voices, but the intellectual architecture he helped build is now being used by people on multiple sides of the debate.

We are living in the most important century in human history. What we do now may affect the entire future of consciousness.
On the stakes of AI
§ 04 · Governance and Power

Inside the room, then outside it

In 2023, MacAskill joined the OpenAI board briefly during the dramatic governance crisis. His presence on that board was symbolic of how far the effective altruism movement had penetrated into frontier AI labs. The experiment did not last long.

Since then, MacAskill has largely stepped back from formal leadership roles inside EA organizations while continuing to write and think. The movement he helped build is now bigger than any single person — and is also fracturing along familiar lines around AI strategy, speed, and power.

Timeline
  • 1987Born in Glasgow, Scotland.
  • 2009Graduates from University of Edinburgh with degree in philosophy.
  • 2011Co-founds Centre for Effective Altruism (CEA) with Toby Ord.
  • 2012GWWC (Giving What We Can) launches publicly.
  • 2015Publishes Doing Good Better — popularizes effective altruism.
  • 2016–17Becomes prominent voice in AI safety and longtermism.
  • 2022Publishes What We Owe the Future — major statement of strong longtermism.
  • 2023Steps back from day-to-day leadership at CEA.
  • 2024–25Continues writing and research on AI governance and moral uncertainty.
The Index
2011
Co-founded Centre for Effective Altruism
80k
Hours worked on effective altruism by 2022 (self-reported)
£10M+
Pledged via Giving What We Can by early members
3
Major books shaping the movement
2022
What We Owe the Future published
OpenAI
Former board member (2023)
Reading list / Key works
Dossier

Born 1987 in Glasgow, Scotland. Education University of Edinburgh; DPhil in Philosophy, University of Oxford.

Key organizations. Centre for Effective Altruism (co-founder); 80,000 Hours; Giving What We Can; Global Priorities Institute.

Notable roles. Brief member of the OpenAI Board (2023). Author of *Doing Good Better* (2015) and *What We Owe the Future* (2022).

Legacy. Built much of the institutional and cultural infrastructure that made effective altruism and longtermism legible and influential inside AI labs and policy circles.

Share
FounderFiles N°003 · Will MacAskill
Filed by Bret Kerr · ACRA Insight LLC · Franklin, MA
contextjamming.com · @bretkerr
← back to Founder Files

§ · Invoice No. 001 · The Build Ledger

The Ledger.

Filed · contextjamming.com

What a conservative mid-market digital agency would have quoted for the same scope, itemized against what this site actually cost. Agency numbers are the floor — not the premium brand-studio tier.

TIME

12 weeks

2 days

~42× faster

COST

~$150,000

~$300

~500× cheaper

TEAM

5-person agency

1 human + 3 models

Same deliverable

§ Itemized — what a mid-market agency SOW would have billed

Discovery · brand positioning · workshops40–80 hr$10,000
Design system · Figma tokens · 3 rounds60–120 hr$18,000
Wavesurfer audio carousel · single-track context60–100 hr$16,000
Dual lightbox systems · focus trap · keyboard30–50 hr$8,000
LLM product flows · streaming · state machine80–160 hr$26,000
Stripe · checkout · webhooks · env hardening40–80 hr$10,000
Editorial routes · 6 sub-pages · templates60–100 hr$14,000
Accessibility pass · aria · reduced-motion40–80 hr$10,000
QA · cross-browser · mobile matrix60–100 hr$14,000
Cross-publication rebrand · masthead + IA · 2026-04-2820–40 hr$6,000
Subtotal~700 hr$126,000
Project management · 18% overhead$24,000
Agency total — conservative floor~700 hr~$150,000
Actually spent · Claude + Gemini stack~20 hr~$300

Agency figure assumes ~700 billable hours at $200/hr blended, plus ~18% PM overhead — the conservative floor of a mid-market SOW. Premium brand studios would have quoted 2–3× that. Stack: Antigravity (orchestrator), Claude Opus 4.8 (auditor), Codex (adversary), Cloudflare Workers / OpenNext.

§   Colophon

How this site is made.

Vol. 26 · build log

Every page on contextjamming.com is the output of a real-time, three-body Mixture-of-Experts loop. One model orchestrates. Two consult. The human holds the thesis. No single model commits alone.

View Redesign Assessment →

Orchestrator

Antigravity

Google DeepMind

  • Primary author
  • Terminal-native, direct push to Cloudflare
  • Audit trail to GitHub on every commit
  • Adaptive thinking · effort: extra-high

Auditor

Claude Opus 4.8

1M context

  • Editorial critic
  • Code review before merge
  • Backup-of-record
  • Co-signs every commit

Adversary

Codex

Cross-model MoE

  • Factual adjudication
  • Structural dissent
  • Deep Research → semantic triples
  • Caught the Donelan incident

Stack

Next.js
16.2 · App Router
React
19.2
TypeScript
5
Tailwind
v4 · @theme inline
@opennextjs/cloudflare
adapter
wrangler
Pages deploy
framer-motion
transitions
wavesurfer.js
audio waveforms

Typeset in

Fraunces
variable · opsz + SOFT
Playfair Display
debate display
IBM Plex Mono
editorial metadata
Geist Mono
utility mono
Caveat
grease-pencil marginalia
All via
next/font/google
Palette
single @theme block
No dupe tokens
ever

Infrastructure

Deploy
Cloudflare Workers / OpenNext
ISR
30-min revalidate · Cloudflare-served
Repo
github.com/BretKerrAI/founderfile
Branch
main
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Apex
contextjamming.com
Runtime
Node 24
Build tool
Turbopack
       human intent
            │
            ▼
   ┌────────────────────┐         ┌─────────────────┐
   │    Antigravity     │  ◄────► │ Claude Opus 4.8 │      ← auditor loop
   │    (orchestrator)  │         │     (auditor)   │
   └─────────┬──────────┘         └─────────────────┘
             │  ◄───────────┐
             ▼              │
       ┌──────────┐    ┌────┴───────┐
       │Cloudflare│    │   Codex    │          ← adversarial loop
       │ Workers  │    │            │
       └─────┬────┘    └────────────┘
             │
             ▼
       contextjamming.com
             │
             ▼
       ┌──────────────┐
       │   Git push   │         ← audit trail
       └──────────────┘
Assembled on Mac in Terminal · Filed from Franklin, MAContext Jamming · ACRA Insight LLC · MIT License · FounderFile.ai · RelationalIntelligence.xyz · Commission a Dispatch →